In 2009, an influential panel of medical experts ignited a controversy when they recommended that most women should not begin routine mammograms to screen for breast cancer until the age of fifty, reversing guidelines they had issued just seven years before when they recommended forty as the optimal age to start getting mammograms.Read more...
In 2009, an influential panel of medical experts ignited a controversy when they recommended that most women should not begin routine mammograms to screen for breast cancer until the age of fifty, reversing guidelines they had issued just seven years before when they recommended forty as the optimal age to start getting mammograms. While some praised the new recommendation as sensible given the smaller benefit women under fifty derive from mammography, many women's groups, health care advocates, and individual women saw the guidelines as privileging financial considerations over women's health and a setback to decades-long efforts to reduce the mortality rate of breast cancer.
In The Big Squeeze, Dr. Handel Reynolds, a practicing radiologist, notes that this episode was only the most recent controversy in the turbulent history of mammography since its introduction in the early 1970s. In a book written for the millions of women who face the decision about whether to get a mammogram, health professionals interested in cancer screening, and public health policymakers, Reynolds shows how pivotal decisions made during mammography's initial launch made it all but inevitable that the test would be contentious. He describes how, at several key points in its history, the emphasis on mammography screening as a fundamental aspect of women's preventive health care coincided with social and political developments, from the women's movement in the early 1970s to breast cancer activism in the 1980s and '90s.
At the same time, aggressive promotion of mammography made the screening tool the cornerstone of a huge new industry. Taking a balanced approach to this much-disputed issue, Reynolds addresses both the benefits and risks of mammography, charting debates, for example, that have weighed the early detection of aggressively malignant tumors against unnecessary treatments resulting from the identification of slow-growing and non-life-threatening cancers. The Big Squeeze, ultimately, helps to evaluate the ongoing public health controversies surrounding mammography and provides a clear understanding of how mammography achieved its current primacy in cancer screening.
- ISBN-13: 9780801450938
- ISBN-10: 0801450934
- Publisher: ILR Press
- Publish Date: August 2012
- Page Count: 121
- Dimensions: 8.63 x 5.83 x 0.56 inches
- Shipping Weight: 0.62 pounds
Series: Culture and Politics of Health Care Work
Publishers Weekly® Reviews
- Reviewed in: Publishers Weekly, page .
- Review Date: 2012-06-11
- Reviewer: Staff
Mammography has never been far from controversy, notes Reynolds, former chief of breast radiology at Indiana University. The cancer screening test has been lashed, he says, by political, social, and financial forces that have muddled the picture regarding its risks and benefits. This book is a quiet call for a more frank discussion of what an “indispensable tool” mammography is in the fight against breast cancer, without ignoring the test’s risks. Reynolds takes a critical look at the “breast cancer epidemic”; the ever-shifting guidelines regarding the age at which women should be screened ( 40? 50?); confusing interpretations of trial results; the role of breast cancer activists in promoting mammograms; and the profitable industry that has grown up around mammography. And after 40 years of screening, there still remains a stubborn silence about false readings and overdiagnosis. “Women... need complete and accurate information regarding the risks and benefits,” Reynolds asserts—and this brief, clear volume can be the first step in achieving that goal. (Aug.)