Customers Also Bought
This is not a book about how great generals won their battles, nor is it a study in grand strategy. "Men of War" is instead a riveting, visceral, and astonishingly original look at ordinary soldiers under fire.
Drawing on an immense range of firsthand sources from the battlefield, Alexander Rose begins by re-creating the lost and alien world of eighteenth-century warfare at Bunker Hill, the bloodiest clash of the War of Independence and reveals why the American militiamen were so lethally effective against the oncoming waves of British troops. Then, focusing on Gettysburg, Rose describes a typical Civil War infantry action, vividly explaining what Union and Confederate soldiers experienced before, during, and after combat. Finally, he shows how in 1945 the Marine Corps hurled itself with the greatest possible violence at the island of Iwo Jima, where nearly a third of all Marines killed in World War II would die. As Rose demonstrates, the most important factor in any battle is the human one: At Bunker Hill, Gettysburg, and Iwo Jima, the American soldier, as much as any general, proved decisive.
To an unprecedented degree, " Men of War "brings home the reality of combat and, just as important, its aftermath in the form of the psychological and medical effects on veterans. As such, the book makes a critical contribution to military history by narrowing the colossal gulf between the popular understanding of wars and the experiences of the soldiers who fight them.
Praise for "Men of War"
A tour de force . . . strikingly vivid, well-observed, and compulsively readable. "The Daily Beast"
Military history at its best . . . This is indeed war up-close, as those who fought it lived it and survived it if they could. "Men of War" is deeply researched, beautifully written. "The Wall Street Journal"
A brilliant, riveting, unique book . . . "Men of War" will be a classic. General David H. Petraeus, U.S. Army (Retired)
The fact is that "Men of War" moves and educates, with the reader finding something interesting and intriguing on virtually every page. "National Review"
This is a book that has broad value to a wide audience. Whether the reader aims to learn what actually happens in battle, draw on the military lessons within, or wrestle with what actually defines combat, "Men of War" is a valuable addition to our understanding of this all-too-human experience. "The New Criterion"
A highly recommended addition to the literature of military history . . . Rose] writes vividly and memorably, with a good eye for the telling detail or anecdote. "Kirkus Reviews" (starred review)
Using the firsthand accounts of brave soldiers who fought for freedom, Rose sheds new light on viewpoints we haven t heard as widely before. It s a welcome perspective in an era where most people have no military experience to speak of. "The Washington Times"
Rose poignantly captures the terror and confusion of hand-to-hand combat during the battle. "The Dallas Morning News"
If you want to know the meaning of war at the sharp end, this is the book to read. James McPherson, Pulitzer Prize winning author of "The War That Forged a Nation""
Publishers Weekly® Reviews
- Reviewed in: Publishers Weekly, page .
- Review Date: 2015-06-22
- Reviewer: Staff
Inspired by the experience of the British soldier in John Keegan's The Face of Battle, a classic work of military history, Rose (The American Rifle) looks at three iconic battles in American military history—Bunker Hill, Gettysburg, and Iwo Jima—through the American soldier's perspective, mining an immense database of secondary and primary sources to relate the experience of battle largely in the words of the soldier participants. Rose takes the reader into the firing line with the smoke and horror of combat. One consistent theme that he illuminates is the constant danger of infantry combat: the risk of death or injury is high, and the wounds, both fatal and non-fatal, are often gruesome. The detailed descriptions of the state of medical support for wounded soldiers is another important focus, and Rose makes the point that medical science, even in the relatively modern battle of Iwo Jima in 1945, was strained by the needs of the wounded. The physiological impact on the survivors of battle is also stressed throughout. Rose's grim, unadorned, yet immensely readable look at battle is a dose of what real war is like, and a good balance to the more common sanitized military history fare. (June)