Conservation Refugees : The Hundred-Year Conflict Between Global Conservation and Native Peoples (Hardcover)
by Mark Dowie

In Stock.

FREE Express Shipping for Club Members

  • Retail Price: $28.95
  • Online Price
    $26.05
 

Connect with BAM!

Share this with a friend

See what others are saying

 

0 Ratings

 
 
 

Quick Links:
Overview
Details
Customer Reviews
Publisher's Weekly
Discussion


New & Used Marketplace 27 copies from $2.99

 
 
 
Other Formats
Titles
Our Price
New & Used Marketplace
  Conservation Refugees (Paperback)
  Published 2011-02-25
  Publisher: MIT Press (MA)
$11.96 11 copies from $15.21
 
 
 
Overview

Since 1900, more than 108,000 officially protected conservation areas have been established worldwide, largely at the urging of five international conservation organizations. About half of these areas were occupied or regularly used by indigenous peoples. Millions who had been living sustainably on their land for generations were displaced in the interests of conservation. In Conservation Refugees, Mark Dowie tells this story. This is a "good guy vs. good guy" story, Dowie writes; the indigenous peoples' movement and conservation organizations have a vital common goal--to protect biological diversity--and could work effectively and powerfully together to protect the planet and preserve biological diversity. Yet for more than a hundred years, these two forces have been at odds. The result: thousands of unmanageable protected areas and native peoples reduced to poaching and trespassing on their ancestral lands or "assimilated" but permanently indentured on the lowest rungs of the money economy. Dowie begins with the story of Yosemite National Park, which by the turn of the twentieth century established a template for bitter encounters between native peoples and conservation. He then describes the experiences of other groups, ranging from the Ogiek and Maasai of eastern Africa and the Pygmies of Central Africa to the Karen of Thailand and the Adevasis of India. He also discusses such issues as differing definitions of "nature" and "wilderness," the influence of the "BINGOs" (Big International NGOs, including the Worldwide Fund for Nature, Conservation International, and The Nature Conservancy), the need for Western scientists to respect and honor traditional lifeways, and the need for native peoples to blend their traditional knowledge with the knowledge of modern ecology. When conservationists and native peoples acknowledge the interdependence of biodiversity conservation and cultural survival, Dowie writes, they can together create a new and much more effective paradigm for conservation.

 
 
 
Details
  • ISBN-13: 9780262012614
  • ISBN-10: 0262012618
  • Publisher: MIT Press (MA)
  • Publish Date: May 2009
  • Page Count: 341
  • Reading Level: Ages 22-UP

Related Categories

Books > Nature > Environmental Conservation & Protection - General
Books > Political Science > Public Policy - Environmental Policy
Books > Social Science > Ethnic Studies - General

 
 
 
Publisher's Weekly Reviews

Publishers Weekly® Reviews

  • Reviewed in: Publishers Weekly, page 43.
  • Review Date: 2009-02-23
  • Reviewer: Staff

With a beautiful balance of critique and sympathy, Dowie (Losing Ground) challenges the halos of the major multinational conservation nonprofits, including the Nature Conservancy and the Worldwide Fund for Nature, in this exposé of their disastrous treatment and expulsions of indigenous peoples living in nature reserves and parks. Dowie traces the myth of “wilderness” as an “idealized version of nature” to John Muir, the “Godfather of Conservation,” who denied that Indians ever lived in Yosemite despite their longtime cultivation of the area; he was “revolted” by their eating habits and “uncleanliness” and said they “had no place in the landscape.” This American concoction of a pristine wilderness park, and the idea that humans are not a part of nature, was exported throughout the world, wreaking havoc among both dislocated indigenous people and the environments that they had nurtured with traditional knowledge, for hundreds, even thousands of years. Dowie comes to a surprisingly optimistic conclusion, noting recent collaborations between indigenous peoples and conservation organizations—who are beginning to realize that “only by preserving cultural diversity can biological diversity be protected, and vice versa.” (May)

 
 
 
Customer Reviews

 
 

DISCUSSION