|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recommendations
Products
- Online Price: $16.80Save 40%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $22.83Save 18%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $12.96Save 19%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $19.32Save 31%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $20.55Save 29%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $16.85Save 32%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $19.32Save 33%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $12.86Save 24%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $22.75Save 35%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $27.99
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $23.35Save 33%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $21.35Save 39%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $36.99Save 38%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $16.88Save 32%
- Add to Cart
- Online Price: $26.00
- Add to Cart
Related Categories Books > History > United States - 19th Century |
Publishers Weekly® Reviews
- Reviewed in: Publishers Weekly, page .
- Review Date: 2011-07-11
- Reviewer: Staff
This rendering of an oft-told tale brings to life a moment in the nation's history when access to the president was easy, politics bitter, and medical knowledge slight. James A. Garfield, little recalled today, gained the Republican nomination for president in 1880 as a dark-horse candidate and won. Then, breaking free of the sulfurous factional politics of his party, he governed honorably, if briefly, until shot by an aggrieved office seeker. Under Millard's (The River of Doubt) pen, Garfield's deranged assassin, his incompetent doctors (who, for example, ignored antisepsis, leading to a blood infection), and the bitter politics of the Republican Party come sparklingly alive through deft characterizations. Even Alexander Graham Bell, who hoped that one of his inventions might save the president's life, plays a role. Millard also lays the groundwork for a case that, had Garfield lived, he would have proved an effective and respected chief executive. Today, he would surely have survived, probably little harmed by the bullet that lodged in him, but unimpeded infection took his life. His death didn't greatly harm the nation, and Millard's story doesn't add much to previous understanding, but it's hard to imagine its being better told. Illus. (Sept.)
Behind-the-scenes of an unrealized presidency
Sixteen years after Abraham Lincoln’s assassination, the president of the United States still strolled around Washington on foot, unaccompanied by security. When he was going on a trip, he casually took a carriage to the railroad station and headed for the platform.
And so, a mentally deranged man who has gone down in history as a “disappointed officer seeker” was able to shoot James Garfield in 1881 without any real hindrance as the president was about to board a train a few months after his inauguration. Bad as that was, it wasn’t the worst of it: The wound should not have been fatal. Garfield died 10 weeks later of an infection caused by bullheaded doctors who actively rejected the landmark medical advance known as antisepsis, already common in Europe.
Most Americans learn something of this in history class, but the compelling details are little remembered. Candice Millard, author of the best-selling River of Doubt about Theodore Roosevelt, revives the story of Garfield’s life and death in The Destiny of the Republic, making a strong case that he was on course to be one of our more notable presidents when Charles Guiteau raised his gun. Millard weaves together the life journeys of Garfield and Guiteau with that of a somewhat unexpected third character: the estimable Alexander Graham Bell, who was already famous for inventing the telephone and labored passionately to build a device that could detect the location of the bullet in Garfield’s body.
Garfield was a remarkable person, who rose from poverty to become a scholar, Civil War hero and respected politician. While his presidency was too short for real achievement, his death did lead to civil service reform, crucial improvements in medicine and the perfection of Bell’s “induction balance” device. Millard’s spirited book helps restore him to an appropriate place in our consciousness.
































