menu
{ "item_title" : "Against Obligation", "item_author" : [" Abner S. Greene "], "item_description" : "Do citizens of a nation such as the United States have a moral duty to obey the law? Do officials, when interpreting the Constitution, have an obligation to follow what that text meant when ratified? To follow precedent? To follow what the Supreme Court today says the Constitution means?These are questions of political obligation (for citizens) and interpretive obligation (for anyone interpreting the Constitution, often officials). Abner Greene argues that such obligations do not exist. Although citizens should obey some laws entirely, and other laws in some instances, no one has put forth a successful argument that citizens should obey all laws all the time. Greene's case is not only against obligation. It is also for an approach he calls permeable sovereignty all of our norms are on equal footing with the state's laws. Accordingly, the state should accommodate religious, philosophical, family, or tribal norms whenever possible. Greene shows that questions of interpretive obligation share many qualities with those of political obligation. In rejecting the view that constitutional interpreters must follow either prior or higher sources of constitutional meaning, Greene confronts and turns aside arguments similar to those offered for a moral duty of citizens to obey the law.", "item_img_path" : "https://covers1.booksamillion.com/covers/bam/0/67/406/441/0674064410_b.jpg", "price_data" : { "retail_price" : "62.00", "online_price" : "62.00", "our_price" : "62.00", "club_price" : "62.00", "savings_pct" : "0", "savings_amt" : "0.00", "club_savings_pct" : "0", "club_savings_amt" : "0.00", "discount_pct" : "10", "store_price" : "" } }
Against Obligation|Abner S. Greene

Against Obligation : The Multiple Sources of Authority in a Liberal Democracy

local_shippingShip to Me
In Stock.
FREE Shipping for Club Members help

Overview

Do citizens of a nation such as the United States have a moral duty to obey the law? Do officials, when interpreting the Constitution, have an obligation to follow what that text meant when ratified? To follow precedent? To follow what the Supreme Court today says the Constitution means?

These are questions of political obligation (for citizens) and interpretive obligation (for anyone interpreting the Constitution, often officials). Abner Greene argues that such obligations do not exist. Although citizens should obey some laws entirely, and other laws in some instances, no one has put forth a successful argument that citizens should obey all laws all the time. Greene's case is not only "against" obligation. It is also "for" an approach he calls "permeable sovereignty" all of our norms are on equal footing with the state's laws. Accordingly, the state should accommodate religious, philosophical, family, or tribal norms whenever possible. Greene shows that questions of interpretive obligation share many qualities with those of political obligation. In rejecting the view that constitutional interpreters must follow either prior or higher sources of constitutional meaning, Greene confronts and turns aside arguments similar to those offered for a moral duty of citizens to obey the law.

This item is Non-Returnable

Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780674064416
  • ISBN-10: 0674064410
  • Publisher: Harvard University Press
  • Publish Date: April 2012
  • Dimensions: 9.46 x 6.47 x 1.04 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.42 pounds
  • Page Count: 352

Related Categories

You May Also Like...

    1

BAM Customer Reviews