menu
{ "item_title" : "Civil Liberties, National Security and Prospects for Consensus", "item_author" : [" Esther D. Reed", "Michael Dumper "], "item_description" : "The idea of security has recently seen a surge of interest from political philosophers. After the atrocities of 11 September 2001 and 7 July 2005, many leading politicians justified encroachments on international legal standards and civil liberties in the name of security and with a view to protecting the rights of the people. Suggestions were made on both sides of the Atlantic to the effect that the extremism of terrorism required the security of the many to be weighed against the liberties of other citizens. In this collection of essays, Jeremy Waldron, Conor Gearty, Tariq Modood, David Novak, Abdelwahab El-Affendi and others debate how to move beyond the false dichotomy whereby fundamental human rights and international standards are conceived as something to be balanced against security. They also examine the claim that this aim might better be advanced by the inclusion in public debate of explicitly religious voices.", "item_img_path" : "https://covers1.booksamillion.com/covers/bam/1/10/747/116/1107471168_b.jpg", "price_data" : { "retail_price" : "47.00", "online_price" : "47.00", "our_price" : "47.00", "club_price" : "47.00", "savings_pct" : "0", "savings_amt" : "0.00", "club_savings_pct" : "0", "club_savings_amt" : "0.00", "discount_pct" : "10", "store_price" : "" } }
Civil Liberties, National Security and Prospects for Consensus|Esther D. Reed

Civil Liberties, National Security and Prospects for Consensus : Legal, Philosophical and Religious Perspectives

local_shippingShip to Me
In Stock.
FREE Shipping for Club Members help

Overview

The idea of security has recently seen a surge of interest from political philosophers. After the atrocities of 11 September 2001 and 7 July 2005, many leading politicians justified encroachments on international legal standards and civil liberties in the name of security and with a view to protecting the rights of the people. Suggestions were made on both sides of the Atlantic to the effect that the extremism of terrorism required the security of the many to be weighed against the liberties of other citizens. In this collection of essays, Jeremy Waldron, Conor Gearty, Tariq Modood, David Novak, Abdelwahab El-Affendi and others debate how to move beyond the false dichotomy whereby fundamental human rights and international standards are conceived as something to be balanced against security. They also examine the claim that this aim might better be advanced by the inclusion in public debate of explicitly religious voices.

This item is Non-Returnable

Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781107471160
  • ISBN-10: 1107471168
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press
  • Publish Date: November 2014
  • Dimensions: 9 x 6 x 0.59 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 0.84 pounds
  • Page Count: 282

Related Categories

You May Also Like...

    1

BAM Customer Reviews