menu
{ "item_title" : "Data Resiliency Enginering", "item_author" : [" Colin O. Cox "], "item_description" : "Data has become one of the most important operating assets in the modern organization. It drives dashboards, analytics, automation, compliance, cybersecurity, supply chains, financial decisions, customer experience, executive strategy, and artificial intelligence. Yet many organizations still protect data as if it were only stored information.That gap is dangerous.Modern data platforms are not simple repositories. They are ecosystems made of source systems, ingestion pipelines, transformation logic, warehouses, data lakes, lakehouses, metadata catalogs, governance policies, access controls, observability platforms, backup systems, recovery processes, dashboards, AI pipelines, and business dependencies. When one part fails, the impact can move quickly across the organization.Data Resiliency Engineering exists to address this reality.It is the discipline of designing, protecting, monitoring, recovering, and governing data systems so they remain trustworthy under stress, attack, disruption, or failure. It brings together data engineering, storage architecture, backup and recovery, cyber resilience, governance, observability, and AI readiness.The purpose is not simply to prevent failure. Failure will happen. The purpose is to detect failure early, limit damage, recover safely, validate trust, and keep the business moving.The Data Resiliency Blueprint provides a practical way for organizations to assess where they are and build a roadmap for improvement.The Data Resiliency Maturity ModelA maturity model helps organizations understand their current state and define their next step. The goal is not to shame immature environments. Every organization begins somewhere. The goal is to create a clear path from reactive data management to resilient data operations.At the first level, the organization is reactive. Data platforms exist, but ownership is unclear, backups may be inconsistent, metadata is limited, recovery is untested, and data quality problems are often discovered by business users. Teams respond to issues after impact has already occurred.At the second level, the organization is aware. Leaders understand that data risk exists. Some critical datasets are identified. Backups are in place for major systems. Basic monitoring exists. Governance efforts may be starting. However, processes are inconsistent, and recovery plans may still focus more on infrastructure than data trust.At the third level, the organization is managed. Critical data products have owners, quality rules, metadata, access controls, and recovery expectations. Pipelines are monitored. Backups are cataloged. Recovery tests are performed for important datasets. Governance and security processes are integrated into data operations.At the fourth level, the organization is resilient. Data platforms are designed for failure. Critical datasets have defined RPO and RTO. Immutable recovery copies exist. Metadata and catalogs are protected. Pipelines are idempotent and replayable. Observability detects issues early. Incident response includes business validation. Recovery drills are routine.At the fifth level, the organization is adaptive. Resiliency is continuously improved through automation, platform health reviews, post-incident learning, AI readiness controls, cyber recovery exercises, governance automation, and risk-based investment. Data resiliency becomes part of culture, architecture, operations, and strategy.The maturity model is not a certification. It is a mirror. It helps organizations see what must improve.", "item_img_path" : "https://covers1.booksamillion.com/covers/bam/9/79/818/075/9798180755728_b.jpg", "price_data" : { "retail_price" : "39.99", "online_price" : "39.99", "our_price" : "39.99", "club_price" : "39.99", "savings_pct" : "0", "savings_amt" : "0.00", "club_savings_pct" : "0", "club_savings_amt" : "0.00", "discount_pct" : "10", "store_price" : "" } }
Data Resiliency Enginering|Colin O. Cox

Data Resiliency Enginering : Building Reliable Data Lakes, Lakehouses, Pipelines, and Recovery-Ready Data Platforms

local_shippingShip to Me
In Stock.
FREE Shipping for Club Members help

Overview

Data has become one of the most important operating assets in the modern organization. It drives dashboards, analytics, automation, compliance, cybersecurity, supply chains, financial decisions, customer experience, executive strategy, and artificial intelligence. Yet many organizations still protect data as if it were only stored information.
That gap is dangerous.
Modern data platforms are not simple repositories. They are ecosystems made of source systems, ingestion pipelines, transformation logic, warehouses, data lakes, lakehouses, metadata catalogs, governance policies, access controls, observability platforms, backup systems, recovery processes, dashboards, AI pipelines, and business dependencies. When one part fails, the impact can move quickly across the organization.
Data Resiliency Engineering exists to address this reality.
It is the discipline of designing, protecting, monitoring, recovering, and governing data systems so they remain trustworthy under stress, attack, disruption, or failure. It brings together data engineering, storage architecture, backup and recovery, cyber resilience, governance, observability, and AI readiness.
The purpose is not simply to prevent failure. Failure will happen. The purpose is to detect failure early, limit damage, recover safely, validate trust, and keep the business moving.
The Data Resiliency Blueprint provides a practical way for organizations to assess where they are and build a roadmap for improvement.
The Data Resiliency Maturity Model
A maturity model helps organizations understand their current state and define their next step. The goal is not to shame immature environments. Every organization begins somewhere. The goal is to create a clear path from reactive data management to resilient data operations.
At the first level, the organization is reactive. Data platforms exist, but ownership is unclear, backups may be inconsistent, metadata is limited, recovery is untested, and data quality problems are often discovered by business users. Teams respond to issues after impact has already occurred.
At the second level, the organization is aware. Leaders understand that data risk exists. Some critical datasets are identified. Backups are in place for major systems. Basic monitoring exists. Governance efforts may be starting. However, processes are inconsistent, and recovery plans may still focus more on infrastructure than data trust.
At the third level, the organization is managed. Critical data products have owners, quality rules, metadata, access controls, and recovery expectations. Pipelines are monitored. Backups are cataloged. Recovery tests are performed for important datasets. Governance and security processes are integrated into data operations.
At the fourth level, the organization is resilient. Data platforms are designed for failure. Critical datasets have defined RPO and RTO. Immutable recovery copies exist. Metadata and catalogs are protected. Pipelines are idempotent and replayable. Observability detects issues early. Incident response includes business validation. Recovery drills are routine.
At the fifth level, the organization is adaptive. Resiliency is continuously improved through automation, platform health reviews, post-incident learning, AI readiness controls, cyber recovery exercises, governance automation, and risk-based investment. Data resiliency becomes part of culture, architecture, operations, and strategy.
The maturity model is not a certification. It is a mirror. It helps organizations see what must improve.

This item is Non-Returnable

Details

  • ISBN-13: 9798180755728
  • ISBN-10: 9798180755728
  • Publisher: Independently Published
  • Publish Date: June 2026
  • Dimensions: 9.61 x 6.69 x 0.68 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.15 pounds
  • Page Count: 326

Related Categories

You May Also Like...

    1

BAM Customer Reviews