menu
{ "item_title" : "Executive Decision-Making and the Courts", "item_author" : [" Tt Arvind", "Richard Kirkham", "Daithí Mac Síthigh "], "item_description" : "In this book, leading experts from across the common law world assess the impact of four seminal House of Lords judgments decided in the 1960s: Ridge v Baldwin, Padfeld v Minister of Agriculture, Conway v Rimmer, and Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission. The 'Quartet' is generally acknowledged to have marked a turning point in the development of court-centred administrative law, and can be understood as a 'formative moment' in the emergence of modern judicial review.These cases are examined not only in terms of the points each case decided, and their contribution to administrative law doctrine, but also in terms of the underlying conception of the tasks of administrative law implicit in the Quartet. By doing so, the book sheds new light on both the complex processes through which the modern system of judicial review emerged and the constitutional choices that are implicit in its jurisprudence. It further reflects upon the implications of these historical processes for how the achievements, failings and limitations of the common law in reviewing actions of the executive can be evaluated.", "item_img_path" : "https://covers3.booksamillion.com/covers/bam/1/50/994/477/150994477X_b.jpg", "price_data" : { "retail_price" : "60.95", "online_price" : "60.95", "our_price" : "60.95", "club_price" : "60.95", "savings_pct" : "0", "savings_amt" : "0.00", "club_savings_pct" : "0", "club_savings_amt" : "0.00", "discount_pct" : "10", "store_price" : "" } }
Executive Decision-Making and the Courts|Tt Arvind

Executive Decision-Making and the Courts : Revisiting the Origins of Modern Judicial Review

local_shippingShip to Me
In Stock.
FREE Shipping for Club Members help

Overview

In this book, leading experts from across the common law world assess the impact of four seminal House of Lords judgments decided in the 1960s: Ridge v Baldwin, Padfeld v Minister of Agriculture, Conway v Rimmer, and Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission. The 'Quartet' is generally acknowledged to have marked a turning point in the development of court-centred administrative law, and can be understood as a 'formative moment' in the emergence of modern judicial review.

These cases are examined not only in terms of the points each case decided, and their contribution to administrative law doctrine, but also in terms of the underlying conception of the tasks of administrative law implicit in the Quartet. By doing so, the book sheds new light on both the complex processes through which the modern system of judicial review emerged and the constitutional choices that are implicit in its jurisprudence. It further reflects upon the implications of these historical processes for how the achievements, failings and limitations of the common law in reviewing actions of the executive can be evaluated.

This item is Non-Returnable

Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781509944774
  • ISBN-10: 150994477X
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
  • Publish Date: October 2022
  • Dimensions: 9.21 x 6.14 x 1.01 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.54 pounds
  • Page Count: 576

Related Categories

You May Also Like...

    1

BAM Customer Reviews