menu
{ "item_title" : "The Fraud Triangle", "item_author" : [" Irene Bembenista "], "item_description" : "In the current study, opinions of faculty from Michigan's baccalaureate degree-granting universities on the ethicality of research behaviors were examined. In the quantitative method and descriptive survey design, descriptive and comparative statistical tests were used to analyze differences in opinions on plagiarism, falsification, and fabrication based upon the variables of publication workload, levels of funding, and research focus. Hypotheses testing revealed no significant statistical difference in opinions on plagiarism and fabrication, but differences did exist for falsification. A significant statistical difference for falsification occurred based upon funding levels. Leadership, especially from highly funded institutions, need to examine why this difference exists. Future qualitative research and future quantitative research with a narrower focus, broader sampling, and modified survey are recommended.", "item_img_path" : "https://covers2.booksamillion.com/covers/bam/3/84/731/423/3847314238_b.jpg", "price_data" : { "retail_price" : "63.72", "online_price" : "63.72", "our_price" : "63.72", "club_price" : "63.72", "savings_pct" : "0", "savings_amt" : "0.00", "club_savings_pct" : "0", "club_savings_amt" : "0.00", "discount_pct" : "10", "store_price" : "" } }
The Fraud Triangle|Irene Bembenista

The Fraud Triangle : A Comparative Analysis of Research Misconduct

local_shippingShip to Me
In Stock.
FREE Shipping for Club Members help

Overview

In the current study, opinions of faculty from Michigan's baccalaureate degree-granting universities on the ethicality of research behaviors were examined. In the quantitative method and descriptive survey design, descriptive and comparative statistical tests were used to analyze differences in opinions on plagiarism, falsification, and fabrication based upon the variables of publication workload, levels of funding, and research focus. Hypotheses testing revealed no significant statistical difference in opinions on plagiarism and fabrication, but differences did exist for falsification. A significant statistical difference for falsification occurred based upon funding levels. Leadership, especially from highly funded institutions, need to examine why this difference exists. Future qualitative research and future quantitative research with a narrower focus, broader sampling, and modified survey are recommended.

This item is Non-Returnable

Details

  • ISBN-13: 9783847314233
  • ISBN-10: 3847314238
  • Publisher: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
  • Publish Date: December 2011
  • Dimensions: 9 x 6 x 0.34 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 0.49 pounds
  • Page Count: 144

Related Categories

You May Also Like...

    1

BAM Customer Reviews