menu
{ "item_title" : "Improvement of Engineering Program Using Nsee Standards", "item_author" : [" Manny Panganiban "], "item_description" : "This study assessed the level and drivers of student engagement in the engineering programs of School A using a localized National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) framework. Employing a quantitative descriptive-diagnostic design, data were gathered through a structured online questionnaire administered via Google Forms to all 43 first-, second-, and third-year students enrolled in the Computer, Electronics, and Industrial Engineering programs in Academic Year 2025-2026, and analyzed using frequency distributions, weighted means, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression. Results showed that four engagement dimensions-Academic Challenge, Learning with Peers, Campus Environment, and Financial Capability-were rated High, while Experience with Faculty obtained only a Moderate rating (overall mean = 2.45), identifying it as the weakest engagement dimension and primary diagnostic priority.", "item_img_path" : "https://covers4.booksamillion.com/covers/bam/6/63/007/809/6630078098_b.jpg", "price_data" : { "retail_price" : "77.00", "online_price" : "77.00", "our_price" : "77.00", "club_price" : "77.00", "savings_pct" : "0", "savings_amt" : "0.00", "club_savings_pct" : "0", "club_savings_amt" : "0.00", "discount_pct" : "10", "store_price" : "" } }
Improvement of Engineering Program Using Nsee Standards|Manny Panganiban

Improvement of Engineering Program Using Nsee Standards

local_shippingShip to Me
In Stock.
FREE Shipping for Club Members help

Overview

This study assessed the level and drivers of student engagement in the engineering programs of School A using a localized National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) framework. Employing a quantitative descriptive-diagnostic design, data were gathered through a structured online questionnaire administered via Google Forms to all 43 first-, second-, and third-year students enrolled in the Computer, Electronics, and Industrial Engineering programs in Academic Year 2025-2026, and analyzed using frequency distributions, weighted means, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression. Results showed that four engagement dimensions-Academic Challenge, Learning with Peers, Campus Environment, and Financial Capability-were rated "High," while Experience with Faculty obtained only a "Moderate" rating (overall mean = 2.45), identifying it as the weakest engagement dimension and primary diagnostic priority.

This item is Non-Returnable

Details

  • ISBN-13: 9786630078091
  • ISBN-10: 6630078098
  • Publisher: Scholars' Press
  • Publish Date: May 2026
  • Dimensions: 9 x 6 x 0.21 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 0.28 pounds
  • Page Count: 88

Related Categories

You May Also Like...

    1

BAM Customer Reviews