menu
{ "item_title" : "Inconsistency in Science", "item_author" : [" Joke Meheus "], "item_description" : "For centuries, inconsistencies were seen as a hindrance to good reasoning, and their role in the sciences was ignored. In recent years, however, logicians as well as philosophers and historians have showed a growing interest in the matter. Central to this change were the advent of paraconsistent logics, the shift in attention from finished theories to construction processes, and the recognition that most scientific theories were at some point either internally inconsistent or incompatible with other accepted findings. The new interest gave rise to important questions. How islogical anarchy' avoided? Is it ever rational to accept an inconsistent theory? In what sense, if any, can inconsistent theories be considered as true? The present collection of papers is the first to deal with this kind of questions. It contains case studies as well as philosophical analyses, and presents an excellent overview of the different approaches in the domain.", "item_img_path" : "https://covers3.booksamillion.com/covers/bam/1/40/200/630/1402006306_b.jpg", "price_data" : { "retail_price" : "109.99", "online_price" : "109.99", "our_price" : "109.99", "club_price" : "109.99", "savings_pct" : "0", "savings_amt" : "0.00", "club_savings_pct" : "0", "club_savings_amt" : "0.00", "discount_pct" : "10", "store_price" : "" } }
Inconsistency in Science|Joke Meheus

Inconsistency in Science

local_shippingShip to Me
In Stock.
FREE Shipping for Club Members help

Overview

For centuries, inconsistencies were seen as a hindrance to good reasoning, and their role in the sciences was ignored. In recent years, however, logicians as well as philosophers and historians have showed a growing interest in the matter. Central to this change were the advent of paraconsistent logics, the shift in attention from finished theories to construction processes, and the recognition that most scientific theories were at some point either internally inconsistent or incompatible with other accepted findings. The new interest gave rise to important questions. How is logical anarchy' avoided? Is it ever rational to accept an inconsistent theory? In what sense, if any, can inconsistent theories be considered as true?
The present collection of papers is the first to deal with this kind of questions. It contains case studies as well as philosophical analyses, and presents an excellent overview of the different approaches in the domain.

This item is Non-Returnable

Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781402006302
  • ISBN-10: 1402006306
  • Publisher: Springer
  • Publish Date: May 2002
  • Dimensions: 9.9 x 6.34 x 0.71 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.13 pounds
  • Page Count: 223

Related Categories

You May Also Like...

    1

BAM Customer Reviews