menu
{ "item_title" : "State Department", "item_author" : [" U. S. Government Accountability Office ( "], "item_description" : "Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of State's staffing at overseas posts, focusing on: (1) the process used by State to determine how many of its U.S. diplomatic personnel are needed at each location; (2) State's efforts to improve this process; and (3) the process State used to identify the 17 posts closed in 1993 and 1994. GAO found that: (1) State does not use an objective, quantifiable methodology based on U.S. foreign policy priorities for determining the number of personnel needed at overseas posts; (2) using a rank ordering of posts could ensure that lower-ranked posts do not have more staff than needed; (3) senior State officials have acknowledged that the personnel management and allocation process does not adequately link personnel resources with policy priorities; (4) State officials are working to develop a resource management strategy to meet priority goals; (5) since 1991, State has been developing a methodology to establish staffing level benchmarks for individual countries based on their importance to U.S. interests; and (6) State did not base its post closure decisions on agencywide policy priorities, but rather on geographic bureau objectives and priorities.", "item_img_path" : "https://covers1.booksamillion.com/covers/bam/1/28/724/572/1287245722_b.jpg", "price_data" : { "retail_price" : "14.75", "online_price" : "14.75", "our_price" : "14.75", "club_price" : "14.75", "savings_pct" : "0", "savings_amt" : "0.00", "club_savings_pct" : "0", "club_savings_amt" : "0.00", "discount_pct" : "10", "store_price" : "" } }
State Department|U. S. Government Accountability Office (

State Department : Overseas Staffing Process Not Linked to Policy Priorities: NSIAD-94-228

local_shippingShip to Me
In Stock.
FREE Shipping for Club Members help

Overview

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of State's staffing at overseas posts, focusing on: (1) the process used by State to determine how many of its U.S. diplomatic personnel are needed at each location; (2) State's efforts to improve this process; and (3) the process State used to identify the 17 posts closed in 1993 and 1994.
GAO found that: (1) State does not use an objective, quantifiable methodology based on U.S. foreign policy priorities for determining the number of personnel needed at overseas posts; (2) using a rank ordering of posts could ensure that lower-ranked posts do not have more staff than needed; (3) senior State officials have acknowledged that the personnel management and allocation process does not adequately link personnel resources with policy priorities; (4) State officials are working to develop a resource management strategy to meet priority goals; (5) since 1991, State has been developing a methodology to establish staffing level benchmarks for individual countries based on their importance to U.S. interests; and (6) State did not base its post closure decisions on agencywide policy priorities, but rather on geographic bureau objectives and priorities.

This item is Non-Returnable

Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781287245728
  • ISBN-10: 1287245722
  • Publisher: Bibliogov
  • Publish Date: July 2013
  • Dimensions: 9.69 x 7.44 x 0.05 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 0.15 pounds
  • Page Count: 26

Related Categories

You May Also Like...

    1

BAM Customer Reviews