menu
{ "item_title" : "Air Defense Initiative", "item_author" : [" U. S. Government Accountability Office ( "], "item_description" : "In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed: (1) selected aspects of the Department of Defense (DOD) Air Defense Initiative (ADI) Program; (2) DOD use of ADI funding for fiscal year (FY) 1988 and its plans for FY 1989; and (3) DOD officials' opinions on the advantages and disadvantages of, and possible alternatives to, the ADI management structure. GAO found that: (1) Congress consolidated separate Navy and Air Force budget requests for FY 1988 into a single program element and made the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) responsible for determining the funding amount for each service; (2) the ADI Program received $49.2 million for FY 1988, of which the Air Force received $30.8 million, the Navy $12 million, and a classified program $6.4 million; (3) OSD requested $173.3 million and $40.2 million for FY 1989 for the Air Force and the Navy, respectively, but received a total of only $159.6 million; and (4) DOD had not finalized an overall full-scale development plan or determined total program research and development costs. GAO also found that DOD officials: (1) generally supported the ADI management structure; (2) believed that a less centralized structure would result in insufficient coordination of activities, and that a more centralized structure might not receive adequate cooperation from the services, would cost more, and would make it more difficult for ADI to benefit from existing programs; and (3) were addressing issues concerning pproviding contractors concepts with complete classified threat information. In addition, GAO found that, although: (1) the administration directed that ADI deployment decisions occur in the same time frame as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) Program, the ADI schedule was behind the SDI schedule; and (2) DOD authorized the SDI Program to begin the demonstration/validation phase of its acquisition process in September 1987 and the ADI Program would not reach this phase until FY 1990, DOD expected ADI to begin", "item_img_path" : "https://covers2.booksamillion.com/covers/bam/1/28/907/985/1289079854_b.jpg", "price_data" : { "retail_price" : "15.75", "online_price" : "15.75", "our_price" : "15.75", "club_price" : "15.75", "savings_pct" : "0", "savings_amt" : "0.00", "club_savings_pct" : "0", "club_savings_amt" : "0.00", "discount_pct" : "10", "store_price" : "" } }
Air Defense Initiative|U. S. Government Accountability Office (

Air Defense Initiative : Program Cost and Schedule Not Yet Determined: NSIAD-89-2FS

local_shippingShip to Me
In Stock.
FREE Shipping for Club Members help

Overview

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed: (1) selected aspects of the Department of Defense (DOD) Air Defense Initiative (ADI) Program; (2) DOD use of ADI funding for fiscal year (FY) 1988 and its plans for FY 1989; and (3) DOD officials' opinions on the advantages and disadvantages of, and possible alternatives to, the ADI management structure.

GAO found that: (1) Congress consolidated separate Navy and Air Force budget requests for FY 1988 into a single program element and made the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) responsible for determining the funding amount for each service; (2) the ADI Program received $49.2 million for FY 1988, of which the Air Force received $30.8 million, the Navy $12 million, and a classified program $6.4 million; (3) OSD requested $173.3 million and $40.2 million for FY 1989 for the Air Force and the Navy, respectively, but received a total of only $159.6 million; and (4) DOD had not finalized an overall full-scale development plan or determined total program research and development costs. GAO also found that DOD officials: (1) generally supported the ADI management structure; (2) believed that a less centralized structure would result in insufficient coordination of activities, and that a more centralized structure might not receive adequate cooperation from the services, would cost more, and would make it more difficult for ADI to benefit from existing programs; and (3) were addressing issues concerning pproviding contractors concepts with complete classified threat information. In addition, GAO found that, although: (1) the administration directed that ADI deployment decisions occur in the same time frame as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) Program, the ADI schedule was behind the SDI schedule; and (2) DOD authorized the SDI Program to begin the demonstration/validation phase of its acquisition process in September 1987 and the ADI Program would not reach this phase until FY 1990, DOD expected ADI to begin

This item is Non-Returnable

Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781289079857
  • ISBN-10: 1289079854
  • Publisher: Bibliogov
  • Publish Date: June 2013
  • Dimensions: 9.69 x 7.44 x 0.06 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 0.16 pounds
  • Page Count: 30

Related Categories

You May Also Like...

    1

BAM Customer Reviews