menu
{ "item_title" : "Railroad Regulation", "item_author" : [" U. S. Government Accountability Office ( "], "item_description" : "Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO: (1) reviewed the economic and financial impacts of the Staggers Rail Act on railroads and shippers; (2) analyzed the financial performance of the railroad industry; and (3) compared railroads' financial performance with that of other transportation industries. GAO found that: (1) the Staggers Rail Act provided greater rate-setting and contracting freedom; (2) cost reduction measures, abandonments, sales of unprofitable lines, and productivity improvements made the railroad industry more competitive; (3) improved competitiveness allowed railroads to regain a share of the intercity freight transportation market; (4) shippers benefited from reduced railroad regulation; (5) railroad reliability increased and freight car shortages, which might interrupt a business, declined; (6) rates did not change to the same degree for all shippers and, because of line abandonments and joint rate cancellations, some shippers experienced increased costs or reduced service; (7) shippers expressed dissatisfaction with the Interstate Commerce Commission's (ICC) relief procedures and questioned whether ICC adequately protected their interests; and (8) in response to shippers' concerns, ICC adopted new policies and procedures for mediating rates and other disputes. GAO also found that: (1) reduced costs and increased efficiency increased the nation's largest railroads' profits, improved their ability to pay long-term obligations, and reduced their debt levels; (2) while ICC deemed certain railroads' revenues as adequate, the railroad industry as a whole did not achieve revenue adequacy and its return on investments did not equal or exceed the current cost of capital; (3) railroads lagged behind both trucks and natural gas pipelines in profitability; and (4) since the 1981-1982 recession, railroads have improved their average annual return on investments by only 3 percent, compared with 16 and 6 percent improvements for trucking and gas pipelines, respectively.", "item_img_path" : "https://covers3.booksamillion.com/covers/bam/1/28/902/408/1289024081_b.jpg", "price_data" : { "retail_price" : "17.75", "online_price" : "17.75", "our_price" : "17.75", "club_price" : "17.75", "savings_pct" : "0", "savings_amt" : "0.00", "club_savings_pct" : "0", "club_savings_amt" : "0.00", "discount_pct" : "10", "store_price" : "" } }
Railroad Regulation|U. S. Government Accountability Office (

Railroad Regulation : Economic and Financial Impacts of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980: Rced-90-80

local_shippingShip to Me
In Stock.
FREE Shipping for Club Members help

Overview

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO: (1) reviewed the economic and financial impacts of the Staggers Rail Act on railroads and shippers; (2) analyzed the financial performance of the railroad industry; and (3) compared railroads' financial performance with that of other transportation industries.

GAO found that: (1) the Staggers Rail Act provided greater rate-setting and contracting freedom; (2) cost reduction measures, abandonments, sales of unprofitable lines, and productivity improvements made the railroad industry more competitive; (3) improved competitiveness allowed railroads to regain a share of the intercity freight transportation market; (4) shippers benefited from reduced railroad regulation; (5) railroad reliability increased and freight car shortages, which might interrupt a business, declined; (6) rates did not change to the same degree for all shippers and, because of line abandonments and joint rate cancellations, some shippers experienced increased costs or reduced service; (7) shippers expressed dissatisfaction with the Interstate Commerce Commission's (ICC) relief procedures and questioned whether ICC adequately protected their interests; and (8) in response to shippers' concerns, ICC adopted new policies and procedures for mediating rates and other disputes. GAO also found that: (1) reduced costs and increased efficiency increased the nation's largest railroads' profits, improved their ability to pay long-term obligations, and reduced their debt levels; (2) while ICC deemed certain railroads' revenues as adequate, the railroad industry as a whole did not achieve revenue adequacy and its return on investments did not equal or exceed the current cost of capital; (3) railroads lagged behind both trucks and natural gas pipelines in profitability; and (4) since the 1981-1982 recession, railroads have improved their average annual return on investments by only 3 percent, compared with 16 and 6 percent improvements for trucking and gas pipelines, respectively.

This item is Non-Returnable

Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781289024086
  • ISBN-10: 1289024081
  • Publisher: Bibliogov
  • Publish Date: June 2013
  • Dimensions: 9.69 x 7.44 x 0.16 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 0.34 pounds
  • Page Count: 78

Related Categories

You May Also Like...

    1

BAM Customer Reviews